RSS

Tag Archives: public company

New Regulation FD

In recent days (April 2 to be exact), the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“S.E.C.“) issued a report that said that Regulation FD could be satisfied by issuers by posting disclosure to social media sites.  To us, this is a logical extension of the J.O.B.S. Act since its intention was to allow small companies to capitalize themselves through the larger reach of the Internet. The S.E.C. release, available at http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2013/2013-51.htm, provides more insight.

Regulation FD is very important for publicly traded companies – it basically states that all investors should receive good and proper information disclosure from publicly traded companies at the same time.  Only certain venues were considered proper outlets to post “Press Releases” and even information on the company’s website was limited and specified.  Nothing worse than getting a comment from the S.E.C. on a registration statement relating to improper disclosure on the company’s own website – news sections posting information news before the official press release or 8K, company newsletters that disclose something improperly, etc.  Here is the S.E.C.’s definition of Regulation FD (http://www.sec.gov/answers/regfd.htm).

Here are some simple rules that we train our client organizations to follow:

  1. Create an “Investors” section of their website.  Link to other public venues for quotes, etc. such as Yahoo! Finance, Google Finance, Market Watch, OTC Markets.
    1. List board members, including committees.
    2. List transfer agent.
    3. List company’s SEC counsel.
    4. List company’s Ethics Statement.
  2. Create a “News” section of website wherein only items that have been released officially through a Regulation FD authorized distributor, such as Market Wire, Mac Report, Business Wire, etc..
  3. Create a “BLOG” section of website for opinions.
  4. Always release information as follows:
    1. Issue 8K, if required.
    2. Issue press release through FD authorized distributor.
    3. Put exact copy of press release on company’s website.
    4. Put exact copy or link to press release on LinkedIn and Facebook company pages.

      Image representing LinkedIn as depicted in Cru...

      Image via CrunchBase

Disclosure is a “by the numbers” issue, meaning every company should come

Image representing Yahoo! Finance as depicted ...

Image via CrunchBase

up with a standard operating procedure (“SOP”) and follow it religiously – more to ensure that news gets the largest reach but also to ensure that a company doesn’t go afoul of the authorities.

 
 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

A5 Laboratories, Inc. Appoints New Management Team

Original posting on MarketWire.com at: http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/a5-laboratories-inc-appoints-new-management-team-otcbb-aflb-1747094.htm. American Security Resources Corporation is a current client of Rhodes Holdings LLC and a future client of American Equity Fund LLC.


SOURCE: American Security Resources Corp.

January 17, 2013 14:31 ET

A5 Laboratories, Inc. Appoints New Management Team

HOUSTON, TX–(Marketwire – Jan 17, 2013) – A5 Laboratories, Inc. (OTCBB: AFLB) announces today the appointment of a new management team in conjunction with a new strategic focus in order to ensure growth in shareholder value. Mr. Frank Neukomm, current Chairman of American Security Resources Corporation (OTCBB: ARSC), was appointed Chairman and CEO. Mr. Robert Farr was appointment COO and President.

As part of our appointment, we intend to refocus operations on the alternative energy generation products and services,” said Mr. Frank Neukomm, incoming Chairman of A5 Laboratories, Inc. “In conjunction with our duties as management of American Security Resources Corporation, we believe that we can enhance the shareholder value within A5 Laboratories, Inc., which we intend to rename ‘Hydra Fuel Cell Corporation’ in the near future as well as change the capital structure to support raising capital to fuel the growth of our operations.

About A5 Laboratories, Inc.

A5 Laboratories, Inc. (http://a5labs.com, traded as ‘AFLB’) was previously a contract research organization serving pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies in North America. The company utilized its research capabilities to license and acquire novel biotechnology products for development and commercialization. In the future, the Company will focus on alternative energy generation products and services.

About American Security Resources Corp.

American Security Resources Corp. (http://www.amsrcorp.com, traded as ‘ARSC’) owns and develops unique intellectual property related to hydrogen fuel cells and business activities to help speed their implementation, funding, and sales.

Safe Harbor Statement

The statements in this release that relate to the Company’s expectations with regard to the future impact on the Company’s results from new products in development are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The results anticipated by any or all of these forward-looking statements may not occur. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly release the result of any revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof, or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes in the Company’s plans or expectations.

Contact Information

Frank Neukomm or Bob Farr
info@amsrcorp.com
713-465-1001


© 2013 by A5 Laboratories, Inc. and American Security Resources Corporation in combination. All rights reserved.

 
3 Comments

Posted by on January 18, 2013 in News

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

American Equity Fund LLC announces Robert C. Rhodes appointed Managing Member

Sugar Land, Texas (September 5, 2012) – American Equity Fund LLC (“AEF”) announces today that its founding member and Rhodes Holdings LLC have come to the conclusion of negotiations to name Robert C. Rhodes of Rhodes Holdings LLC as managing member of AEF.  Working as partners on a number of projects together, Rhodes Holdings LLC and ReCap Marketing & Consulting, LLP (Hunter M.A. Carr, founding member and general partner) determined their interests aligned perfectly on what was missing from the arena that both worked – micro-cap publicly traded companies.  This missing component was non-death spiral funding.

This announcement follows more than six (6) months of review of previous funding(s) that Rhodes Holdings LLC and ReCap Marketing & Consulting, LLP have been a party to, as well review of competing equity line facilities in order to construct an AEF equity line facility that will only enhance shareholder value.

About American Equity Fund LLC

The American Equity Fund LLC (“AEF”) provides an alternative funding mechanism, an Equity Line Facility (“ELF”), for SEC reporting publicly traded micro- and small-cap companies that want to take control of financial futures.  An ELF is a flexible financing structure in which AEF commits to purchase shares of Common Stock directly from an Issuer, at prevailing market prices, over a multi-year period.  When an Issuer elects to drawdown on the ELF, AEF is obligated to purchase an amount of shares equal to the dollar amount requested with a discount to market and warrant coverage to underwriting expenses.  Issuers request drawdowns at their discretion in accordance with the terms of their funding agreement.

About Rhodes Holdings LLC

Rhodes Holdings LLC (“RHL“, http://rhodesholdings.wordpress.com) was founded on the principle that public companies‘ top officers need help with the complexities and demands of the public markets.  Funding their companies and managing public S.E.C. reporting shouldn’t take all of these officers’ time and that is when RHL comes in.  RHL provides a turnkey solution for companies that would like the benefits of being public but have not experienced it before.  RHL was founded by Mr. Robert C. Rhodes in 2005.  Mr. Rhodes is surrounded by professionals dedicated to your success, including SEC lawyers, general counsels, auditors, IR professionals, and investment sources that he has historical knowledge.

Contact information

American Equity Fund LLC
Robert C. Rhodes – 281-435-3917 | robert.rhodes@rhodes-holdings.com
Hunter M.A. Carr – 281-600-6000 | hunter@recapmarketing.com


© 2012 by American Equity Fund LLC, all rights reserved.  Original news release located on American Equity Fund LLC’s website.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on September 5, 2012 in News

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

SEC Securities: The Quiet Period

Summary

During a Quiet Period, a publicly-listed company cannot make any announcements about anything that could cause a normal investor to change their position on the company’s stock. The SEC interprets this rule broadly, even including board members, management, and employees talking about the company. Normally, that means the company does not discuss any of the following:

  • New deals or wins signed in that current quarter. Announcements about previously-sold implementations going live are allowed, but must be explicitly described as such
  • Management changes
  • Progress against company goals
  • Major product or service announcements
  • Major partnership announcements

Why it Matters

The quiet period precedes the introduction of a company into the capital market. During that time, the amount of public exposure and hype must be minimized to hinder any potential interference with SEC efforts to evaluate its filings and the release of any information which may cause investors to “jump the gun” on valuations and expectations for the company. The SEC’s intention is to create a level playing field for all investors in the capital market, ensuring that all have the same information about the company when it goes out for sale on the market.

Activities During the Quiet Period

The federal securities laws do not define the term “quiet period,” which is also referred to as the “waiting period.” However, a quiet period extends from the time a company files a registration statement with the SEC until SEC staff declare the registration statement “effective.” During that period, the federal securities laws limit what information a company and related parties can release to the public. The failure to comply with these restrictions generally is referred to as “gun-jumping.

On June 29, 2005, the Commission voted to adopt modifications to the registration, communications, and offering processes under the Securities Act of 1933. Among many other provisions, the rules update and liberalize permitted offering activity and communications to allow more information to reach investors by revising the “gun-jumping” provisions under the Securities Act. The cumulative effects of these rules are as follows:

  • Well-known seasoned issuers are permitted to engage at any time in oral and written communications, including use at any time of a new type of written communication called a “free writing prospectus,” subject to enumerated conditions (including, in some cases, filing with the Commission).
  • All reporting issuers are, at any time, permitted to continue to publish regularly released factual business information and forward-looking information.
  • Non-reporting issuers are, at any time, permitted to continue to publish factual business information that is regularly released and intended for use by persons other than in their capacity as investors or potential investors.
  • Communications by issuers more than 30 days before filing a registration statement will be permitted so long as they do not reference a securities offering that is the subject of a registration statement.
  • All issuers and other offering participants will be permitted to use a free writing prospectus after the filing of the registration statement, subject to enumerated conditions (including, in some cases, filing with the Commission). Offering participants, other than the issuer, will be liable for a free writing prospectus only if they use, refer to, or participate in the planning and use of the free writing prospectus by another offering participant who uses it. Issuers will have liability for any issuer information contained in any other offering participant’s free writing prospectus as well as any free writing prospectus they prepare, use, or refer to.
  • The exclusions from the definition of prospectus are expanded to allow a broader category of routine communications regarding issuers, offerings, and procedural matters, such as communications about the schedule for an offering or about account-opening procedures.
  • The exemptions for research reports are expanded.

A number of these rules include conditions of eligibility. Most of the rules, for example, are not available to blank check companies, penny stock issuers, or shell companies.

The rules address the treatment under the Securities Act of electronic communications, including electronic road shows and information located on or hyper-linked to an issuer’s website. The rules define written communication as any communication that is written, printed, a radio or television broadcast, or a graphic communication. The definition of graphic communication and, thus, electronic road show excludes communications that are carried live and in real-time to a live audience, regardless of the means of transmission. Electronic road shows for initial public offerings of common equity or convertible equity securities will have to make a bona fide electronic road show readily available to an unrestricted audience to avoid filing the electronic road show with the Commission. No other road shows will be subject to filing.

Research Reports

The newly public company is subject to a “quiet period,” of 40 days after the registration becomes effective, which restricts insiders and affiliated underwriters from issuing earnings forecasts and research reports regarding the firm for a specified period following the initial public offering (IPO). As soon as this quiet period ends, the analysts of managing underwriters typically initiate research coverage with favorable recommendations, and the market responds positively even though this information is predictable.
The general purpose behind the quiet period is to give investors enough time to do their due diligence and allow market forces to establish a fair value without influence from the firm’s management or affiliated analysts who may try to hype the stock. In other words, everything that is relevant should be included in the written prospectus.

Immediately upon expiration of the quiet period, analysts affiliated with investment banks that participated as the lead underwriter or as a co-manager in the deal typically initiate favorable research coverage.


© 2012 by Sonfield & Sonfield, 770 South Post Oak Lane, Houston, Texas 77056-1937.  Reproduced with permission here.

To insure that we comply with U.S. Treasury Department Circular 230. We inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.

 
1 Comment

Posted by on August 20, 2012 in BLOG, Business, Public markets

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Turbine Truck Engines retains Hydra Power Distributors to build distribution channel

Reblogged from Hydra Power Distributors LLC:

Click to visit the original post

(Original press release) PAISLEY, FL (August 2, 2012) - Turbine Truck Engines, Inc. (OTCBB:TTEG) retained Hydra Power Distributors, LLC ("HPD") to develop and grow TTEG’s sales channel for its Hydrogen Energy Production Systems (“HEPS”). HPD will initially concentrate on the creation of joint ventures with internationally-based public, private, and government sponsored entities in order to build a stable and much larger distribution network throughout the world.

Read more… 422 more words

Robert C. Rhodes is the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) for Hydra Power Distributors LLC.
 
 

Tags: , ,

Going public or going private

This last week, the Houston Business Journal for the week of July 20 – 26, 2012 had two divergent articles (“Are you considering going public?” and “Are you considering going private?“) – appropriate as part of the FOCUS section on Public/Private Companies report.  If you are at interested in the process of being a public company, this is a must read.

Public companies

The first article was a great read.  As I have summarized many times before, being a public company is a dual edged sword – there are benefits, but the costs are substantial.  Here are the benefits that the article summarized:

  • Ongoing access to capital
  • Able to provide [public stock] incentives to employees
  • Enhanced prestige with businesses and individuals

But at what cost?

  • Owners must relinquish some amount of control (except if you are Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg who had such a hot property, he was able to retain 51% control during an IPO)
  • Dealing with regulators and shareholders

That’s where a team comes in – if you have a huge company (like a Small Cap corporation, which is $2B to $250M in market capitalization), then the investment bankers will be interesting in helping you.  If your company is more modest, that’s when you call in teams like Rhodes Holdings LLC and its partners, including Re-Cap Marketing and Consulting and others.  Our strategy engagements gets you ready, and helps you retain the professionals focused on the Micro Cap arena (below $250M in market capitalization).

On the other hand, going private

 

 

Tags: , , , , , , ,

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 85 other followers

%d bloggers like this: